Are me
re
DEFARTHIEN
Bon Loe CORRE HOR Om NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 71004
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2400
ThE RE LEN
chee rE
at
wr =_ wey
‘
BAN
Docket No.NRC5333-14
14 November 2914
This ig in reference to your application for correction to your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13
November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, reguiations and policies... The Board also
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Commander Navy
Reserve Forces Command (CNRFC) letter 5420 Ser N1/0883 of 25 Aug 2014,
a copy of which was provided to you on 8 September 2014, and is being
provided to you now. tn addition, the Board also considered your
response to the advisory opinion dated 23 September 201¢.
However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your appiication has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
pocket No.NKO5353-14
of an ofliciai naval
Consequently, when applying for a correction
ate the existence of
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstr
probable material error or imjustice.
Sincerely
LIGVAL ~7
wef a ff
| . f ei ce w LAU
* ROBERT J. ONETLL
” 7 Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5667 14
on 4 September 2014, you have requested a reconsideration of your case. evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an, official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11369 14
The page 11 entry was not considered, as the attached e-mail dated 28 October 2014 from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) shows that neither the entry nor your rebuttal appears in your Official Military Personnel File. A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its gecision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4625 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in Docket NOo.NKU4S62b~-14 this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8269 14
AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3857 14
A three-member panel of the Boar@ for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3828 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO3828-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4443 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3764 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this cage. Docket No.NHRO3764-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an optical naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3861 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.